Food Webs and Keystone Species

🌿 Animals & Plants · Lesson 29 of 50 · about 7 minutes

Advertisement

← Akademi · 🌿 Animals & Plants · Lesson 29 of 50 · about 7 min

Energy flows, nutrients cycle. A plant captures a few percent of light; a herbivore eats the plant and keeps roughly a tenth of the energy it consumed — the rest is metabolism, movement and heat — and a predator gets about a tenth of that tenth. This ten-percent arithmetic is why food chains rarely exceed four or five links, why there are always more grass than gazelle than cheetah, and why eating lower on the chain feeds more people per hectare: the pyramid is not a policy, it is physics.

Remove one link and the cascade reorganises the map. The textbook case: sea otters eat sea urchins, urchins eat kelp. Where otters were hunted out, urchin barrens scraped the kelp forests off the seabed — fish nurseries, storm buffers and carbon sinks lost together; where otters returned, the forest returned with them. Wolves in Yellowstone changed willow and stream banks after their reintroduction reduced overbrowsing. “Keystone species” names exactly this: not the biggest animal, but one whose removal rearranges far more than its own share.

The quiet link everyone forgets is the disposal crew: fungi and decomposer bacteria close every loop, turning dead matter back into plant nutrient, and without them the world would be buried in its own leftovers. Dung beetles were imported to Australia precisely because European cattle dung sat undissolved for years — a living demonstration that even nutrient cycling needs appointed staff.

Key takeaways

  • ~90% of energy is lost at each trophic step — the reason top predators are always rare
  • Keystone effects are real: otters ↔ kelp, wolves ↔ Yellowstone streams
  • Decomposers recycle the atoms; ecosystems are loops of matter driven by one-way energy

Check yourself

Eating lower on the food chain feeds more people per hectare because:

Go deeper

Advertisement
Advertisement